The non-profit industrial building complex is a mess, and it is entangled with capitalism in a complicate and often oppressive way. So I ‘ve been spending some time think and learning about different structures within capitalism for doing sociable change work, which has led me to social entrepreneurship and this horrorshow of a book about “ Capitalism 2.0. ” Ok, so like obviously I have a complicated relationship with capitalism and besides social change and I do n’t think the NPIC is doing excessively well with tho
The non-profit industrial complex is a mess, and it is entangled with capitalism in a complicate and frequently oppressive way. So I ‘ve been spending some prison term think and learning about different structures within capitalism for doing social change study, which has led me to social entrepreneurship and this horrorshow of a book about “ Capitalism 2.0. ” Ok, so like obviously I have a complicated relationship with capitalism and besides social transfer and I do n’t think the NPIC is doing besides good with those things. I think “ disruptors ” are a good mind, but where they are coming from matters, internet explorer : grassroots, POC-led, lived experience-driven solutions plz. I do n’t believe that making money is necessarily malefic, I like money.
That said, I am into the concept of the triple penetrate note, which assesses whether a business is good for people, satellite, and profit rather of merely being profit drive. But who are the arbiters of what ‘s “ good ” ? It can not barely be entrepreneurs, makers, people with ideas and access to capital operating under business rules without accountability, because they come up with fucked up ideas about how to reduce recidivism in youth who are sent to Rikers ( tip : they are n’t abolishing police or prisons or respecting homo rights, soooo nope ). These folks need to be accountability to the communities, emergency room I mean markets, they are aiming at. preferably with communities respected as stakeholders. But that ‘s slow and not disruptive in the way entrepreneurs like so it appears to not be happening at all in these spaces. Except sometimes late there ‘s a “ hack, my bad ” ( see : TOMS shoes ).
besides global capitalism driven by young, whiten, by and large male entrepreneurs is colonialist ? so when the script says that “ the work of social entrepreneurs is largely focused on bringing Capitalism 2.0 ” to the market of “ four billion people in the develop world who earn less than $ 1,500 a year ” that ‘s a serious red iris. I mean, I feel fishy of most international development work, whether it has the glistening entrepreneurial gleam or not. But building up the estimate of people in the develop worldly concern as new consumers … I ‘m not sure how that ‘s “ good ” precisely, unless they are besides the worker owners of the companies that are producing the things. And that ‘s not the thing happening in this script.
So overall, I ‘m gladiolus I read this book because it gave me a better sense of the think behind progressive rich folks who are excited about doing estimable but are actually well-intentioned monsters. besides it made me meditate more on the intrinsic harms of all things under capitalism. Cool report.
Read more: Top 5 Benefits of Collaboration in Business