The Thai Queen who Drowned Because an Ancient Law Forbade Touching a Royal – The Vintage News

There is an entire catalogue of about improbable deaths of royal people. such as Henry I, who was king of England from 1100 until 1135. He died a rather bizarre end, purportedly caused by a meal of lamprey eels. The king dismissed his sophisticate ’ sulfur warnings–they had advised him against consuming the fishy dish. He contracted a disease and, after a short while, passed aside at the age of 67. Another european king, Alexander of Greece, was just 27 when he died in his own bizarre fashion in 1920. The greek king was taking a stroll in his summer palace near Athens when a imp attacked his pet german Shepherd, Fritz. The tamper was reportedly a Barbary macaque that belonged to a palace employee. The king attempted to break up the active animals and ended up a victim himself, as the tamper hurt his leg deoxyadenosine monophosphate well as biting him all over his body. The wounds became infect and less than a calendar month by and by the king was pronounced dead .
It ’ s not only in Europe that members of royal families have died in unusual circumstances. One of the most hard-to-believe such stories is of the queen harmonize of Siam ( contemporary Thailand ), Sunandha Kumariratana. She was the first of the three wives of siamese King Chulalongkorn, who is known for introducing some progressive reforms within his kingdom, like abolishing bondage.

At the time of her death, Sunandha Kumariratana already had one daughter and was expecting another child. In May 1880, when Sunandha was good 19 years honest-to-god, she was on a trip to the royal family ’ s big Bang Pa-In summer residence, outside of Bangkok. She was accompanied by Princess Karnabhorn Bejraratana, not even two years previous, and a group of guards and servants . But reaching the palace required crossing Chao Phraya River, Thailand ’ s biggest river. The queen harmonize and the princess were escorted to a disjoined boat which was dragged by a bigger boat to carry them over the river. relate Video : 6 Cleopatra Myths Debunked hypertext transfer protocol : //youtu.be/xnRssdsGU8U however, the royal vessel capsized in potent currents and both were plunged into the water. none of the royal cortege proceeded to help them. purportedly everyone followed the head of the chief defend, who did not assist them or urge anyone else to help the drowning royals–all three lives were lost while their attendants just stood and watched.

The guards, and everyone else on the scene, were adhering to an old and inflexible Siamese law that did not allow any average person to touch a extremity of the imperial family. Breaking this police was penal with death . According to Misfit History, besides the police, any desire to help save the life of the fagot could have been diminished by a superstitious impression a well. allegedly, saving a person who was drowning in the river was associated with misfortune. If person offered avail to the person that meant meddling with the spirits who lived in the water . After this incident, where three lives could have been easily spared with a fiddling help, King Chulalongkorn proceeded to imprison the attendant who did not give any orders to attempt a rescue. The king greatly grieved the death of his spouse, who is said to be the one he loved the best of all. The funerary emanation that was consequently arranged for the queen was possibly the most expensive funeral in the history of this asian kingdom. relate report from us : queen Mary I of England was not known as “ Bloody Mary ” until more than a century after her death The king besides carried out a bang-up deal of shape to complete the royal summer mansion, which his revered wife was due to visit on the day of her unfortunate death. In the backyard of the palace, he placed a memorial to Sunandha Kumariratana and the children, a reminder of the extraordinary circumstances that ended their lives all besides soon.

reference : https://enrolldetroit.org
class : Education