Social informatics – Wikipedia

Subfield between informatics and sociology
Social informatics is the study of information and communication tools in cultural or institutional context. [ 1 ] Another definition is the interdisciplinary study of the design, uses and consequences of information technologies that takes into account their interaction with institutional and cultural context. [ 2 ] A transdisciplinary field, [ 3 ] social informatics is contribution of a larger body of socio-economic research that examines the ways in which the technological artifact and human social context mutually constitute the information and communications technology ( ICT ) ensemble. [ 4 ] Some proponents of sociable informatics use the relationship of a biological community to its environment as an analogy for the relationship of tools to people who use them. The Center for Social Informatics founded by the former Dr. Rob Kling, an early champion of the field ’ randomness ideas, defines the airfield therefore :

Social Informatics (SI) refers to the body of research and study that examines social aspects of computerization – including the roles of information technology in social and organizational change, the uses of information technologies in social contexts, and the ways that the social organization of information technologies is influenced by social forces and social practices.[5]

inquiry [edit ]

historically, western european concepts of social informatics research has been strong in the scandinavian countries and the UK. [ 6 ] The beginnings can be traced to the 1980s in Norway and Slovenia. [ 7 ] The fundamentals of social informatics in the USA were laid by Kling in 1996 with his colleagues and students from Indiana University. [ 7 ] Within North America, the field is represented largely through independent research efforts at a act of divers institutions. [ 3 ] There are several approaches, which were historically named or classified as social informatics : American, Russian, British, Norwegian, Slovenian, German and Japanese. [ 8 ] The oldest concept of social informatics was founded in the USSR by A.V. Sokolov and his colleagues in the 1970s. [ 8 ] [ 9 ] Social informatics research diverges from earlier, deterministic ( both social and technical ) models for measuring the social impacts of engineering. such technical deterministic models characterized information technologies as tools to be installed and used with a pre-determined set of impacts on club which are dictated by the engineering ’ s stated capabilities. [ 6 ] Similarly, the socially deterministic theory represented by some proponents of the social construction of engineering ( SCOT ) or social shape of engineering theory as advocated by Williams & Edge ( 1996 ) [ 6 ] see engineering as the product of homo social forces. In contrast, some sociable informatics methodologies consider the context surrounding technology and the corporeal properties of the technology to be equally crucial : the people who will interact with a system, the organizational policies governing bring practice, and subscribe resources. [ 4 ] This contextual inquiry produces “ nuanced conceptual understand ” of systems that can be used to examine issues like access to technology, electronic forms of communication, and large-scale networks. [ 10 ]

inquiry in social informatics can be categorized into three orientations. [ 3 ] Normative research focuses on the development of theories based on empirical psychoanalysis that may be used to develop organizational policies and work practices. [ 10 ] The heart of such analyses lies in socio-technical interaction networks, [ 10 ] a framework built around the idea that humans and the technologies they build are “ co-constitutive “, bound together, and that any examen of one must necessarily consider the other. Studies of the analytic orientation develop theory or define methodologies to contribute to theorizing in institutional settings. [ 10 ] Critical analysis, like Lucy Suchman ’ s examination of articulation study, [ 11 ] examine technological solutions from non-traditional perspectives in decree to influence design and implementation. [ 3 ] [ 10 ]

future [edit ]

social informatics is a young intellectual bowel movement and its future is still being defined. however, because SST theorists such as Williams and Edge suggest that the amorphous boundaries between humans and technology that emerge in sociable shaping engineering inquiry indicate that technology is not a clear-cut social attempt desirable of individual sketch, [ 6 ] indicating that there is a motivation for social informatics research that bridges the col between technological and sociable determinism. This observation, coupled with the many fields that contribute research, suggest a future in which social informatics theories and concepts settle to form a substrate, an “ essential analytic basis ” [ 10 ] for work in early disciplines. such foundations can be found in social informatics frameworks such as The Web of Computing position or Socio-Technical Interaction Networks. [ 12 ]

relevant topics about future commission of social informatics are discussed in the book by Fichman and Rosenbaum. [ 7 ] Conceptualization of external discourse, including current trends in inquiry and focus of sociable informatics development is presented in an article by Smutny. [ 8 ] This article discusses current possibilities of development of social informatics within the external hold forth of assorted concepts including possible areas for future cooperation. other topical article by Marcinkowski [ 13 ] presents a position switch from studying entirely the effects of the implementation and consumption of technology to the primary discussion of what are the ideological implications of empiric work in social informatics connected with data analytics approach.

In education [edit ]

social informatics is besides about teaching social issues of computing to calculator skill students. [ 14 ] Depending on educational traditions, social informatics is scattered in the course of study of different disciplines, arsenic well as in computer skill, information skill, informatics ( Europe ) and network sociology. [ 2 ] In some instances there might be a lack of understand of why teaching social issues of calculate is important, both by individual lecturers and students, resulting in a scene that social informatics is bore and without importance. [ 15 ] Some researchers have pointed out that in order to create awareness of the importance of social issues of computing, one has to focus on didactics of social informatics. [ 15 ]

See besides [edit ]

References [edit ]

source :
Category : Education

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.